Study design (if review, criteria of inclusion for studies)
randomized, open-label, multicentre, two-period, crossover study
Participants
patients (n=25) with CF and chronic pulmonary pseudomonal infection
Interventions
Tobramycin 300 mg twice a day for 15 days via: 1. Pari LC plus® with compressor (conventional); 2. Pari eFlow rapid® (vibrating mesh).
Outcome measures
Adherence. Nebulisation time. Sputum tobramycin level. Serum tobramycin level. Adverse events. FEV1.
Main results
Nebulization times were significantly shorter for eFlow rapid versus LC PLUS on Day 1 (least squares mean estimate of the difference -10.5 min, 95% confidence intervals [CI] -12.6, -8.3, p<0.0001) and Day 15 (difference -7.7 min, 95% CI -9.0, -6.5, p<0.0001). Broadly comparable sputum/systemic exposure to tobramycin was observed and the incidence of adverse events was similar for both nebulizers.
Authors' conclusions
Use of the eFlow rapid nebulizer reduced TSI nebulization time. The systemic exposure to tobramycin appeared to be broadly similar in this exploratory study.